Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura O'Connell Rapira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mz7 (talk) 22:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Laura O'Connell Rapira

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

entirely promotional .I thought of afc, but i don't think this is capable of improvement. DGG ( talk ) 11:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - subject is notable through role at Action Station. Tone may be promotional in places but this can be improved. MurielMary (talk) 11:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - agree that subject is notable. DrThneed (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I agree that this subject is notable as in my opinion she has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Ambrosia10 (talk) 01:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes GNG by a wide margin. AfD isn’t cleanup. Schwede 66 16:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep Passes GNG. Gleeanon409 (talk) 19:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to have sufficient independant coverage to count as notable. -Kj cheetham (talk) 07:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.