Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Brehm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirection is an editorial issue. Sandstein 07:32, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Brehm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NMUSIC as I can't find any reliable sources that discuss the subject significantly and it does not meet the criteria listed at the music notability guideline. —Z0 (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect back to Monstercat as it was originally created as such according to the edit history. The artist in question has had more releases on the label than any other label she's released with. 2601:589:8000:2ED0:DCB9:4420:8CC7:ECAB (talk) 20:56, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see why it should redirect to Monstercat which has nothing but a list entry about her. Those searching for Laura Brehm are unlikely to look for the label and certainly wouldn't expect to arrive there from the search page. —Z0 (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kostas20142 (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.