Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latino Youth Alternative High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed as keep per WP:SPEEDYKEEP, nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes, NAC. Umbralcorax (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Latino Youth Alternative High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article with this name created by the same creator (Kausticgirl, who has deleted the previous deletion notices from her talk page) was deleted as a copyright infringement. I tried to access the page from which the deleted text was copied ([1]) but it was unavailable. Would an admin check to see if the page text is the same as before? NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 04:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —Morenooso (talk) 05:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. —Morenooso (talk) 05:06, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Schools are usually considered notable in and of themselves. This one has a 34 year history and gets ghits. --Morenooso (talk) 04:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I nominated this not for non-notability, but because a previous version by the same creator was deleted as a copyright infringement. NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 04:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Fair enough. I've notified Jclemens, who speedy-deleted the prior version, about this discussion.--Arxiloxos (talk) 05:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As this article has been extensively changed, I would like to withdraw this nomination. Is that allowed? NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 06:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I believe you can withdraw it. Place a {{helpme}} tag on your talkpage and someone should be along to help. --Morenooso (talk) 06:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Topic has been discussed in (and has even been the main topic of) multiple secondary sources. It even has Google Scholar hits. Abductive (reasoning) 07:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - I didn't see any copyvio issues with this version, so I assume they have been dealt with. Deletion nomination has been withdrawn so speedy keep is in order. PDCook (talk) 13:06, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.