Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Late Bloomer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn by nominator. NAC. Cliff smith ^talk 15:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Late Bloomer

Unreferenced film which does nothing to prove its notability. There are no reliable and verifiable sources to be found. Tavix (talk) 02:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 02:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Much of the current content is a copy of the info on this YouTube page. Cliff smith ^talk 02:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Though the article is perilously thin, using THIS search parameter, there are actually a great number of sources available: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], etc. This film most definitely is notable. The article simply needs lots of work.
- signed for above: Schmidt,' ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Based on several reviews as found here [9]. That shows both New York Times and the New York Post, along with several other reliable – creditable – third party sources establishes enough coverage to be viewed as Notability by Wikipedia standards. ShoesssS ^Talk 02:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And in actuality there's probably a decent little article possible. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources provided above show that this film is plenty notable. Cleanup is the answer, not deletion. PC78 (talk) 08:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw. The references have been included, thanks for your help in making that happen. Tavix (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.