Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lastonia Leviston

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lastonia Leviston[edit]

Lastonia Leviston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks WP:GNG and WP:REFERENCE. Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 03:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and United States of America. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lean delete Seems like she is only notable for one thing WP:BLP1E and there is not significant coverage and while the article doesn't discuss criminality, I see her akin to the victim of a crime and with her only being known for her privacy being broken, it seems like a weak reason to have an article. As the coverage seems tabloid, and not sustained, lots of reasons push me towards delete. CT55555(talk) 14:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E - reliable sources appear to cover Leviston only in the context of a single event; she appears to otherwise remain, and likely to remain a low-profile individual; this article gives undue weight to the event; and the event does not appear to be particularly significant and her role is either not substantial or not well documented. She sued, won, and appears to have eventually collected on the judgement, but there does not appear to be support in reliable sources for an event article. Beccaynr (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.