Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Call Games
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sango123 01:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Last Call Games[edit]
This is a non-notable website that does not include any outside sources within the article and generates 8 unique google results. Erechtheus 01:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This is a brand new site, created in August 2006; I don't think it needs an article yet. --Brianyoumans 04:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and above. -- Gogo Dodo 04:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Spamgasmic. 205.157.110.11 08:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete —Khoikhoi 08:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable mathewguiver 16:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Save The website has been up since June 2006, not August. This isn't spam, many gaming sites have wikipedia articles. LastCallGames 14:53, 29 August 2006 (EST)
- Delete. Newer sites don't belong on Wikipedia. RobJ1981 08:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (chat/patch) 12:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable "fairly new sites" are generally not notable for Wikipedia. Only an ingenue would not recognize the possible advantages to a new site having a Wikipedia article. :) Dlohcierekim 19:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No Traffic rating at Alex. :) Dlohcierekim 19:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.