Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Cab to Darwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Last Cab to Darwin (stage play)#Film adaptation. (non-admin closure) ansh666 04:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last Cab to Darwin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film has not entered main production (filming) and does not have major coverage, does not meet WP:NFF. I suggest a redirect to Jeremy Sims. BOVINEBOY2008 12:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom to Jeremy Sims. This is still TOO SOON and we do have a decent place where it can be spoken of. Allow undeletion or recreation once notability standards are met. It might be eminently possible before having Last Cab to Darwin (film) to have an article on the award-winning and much-covered stage-play which inspired the film... ie: Last Cab to Darwin (stage play). Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 19:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to new article on the notable play at the section covering the screen adaptation: Last Cab to Darwin (stage play)#Film adaptation. Undo redirection once the film meets WP:NFF (paragraph 3). Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -I would now support a redirect as proposed by Schmidt, . Thankyou for your work in creating an article on the stage play! It was actually a project I had planned after discovering an article did not yet exist when writing the film article. Unfortunately, due to work and study commitments, I just didn't have the time. I support this redirect as it makes more sense than just redirecting to Jeremy Sims which has minimal mention of the upcoming film. Although, I still feel due to the controversial themes and significant mainstream media coverage about casting and the project in general warrants a standalone article about the film. If keep is not the consensus I would request the film article be moved into the draft space or incubated so it does not need to be recreated from scratch once photography begins and a release date is announced. Dfadden (talk) 07:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me... any redirection preserves the history of your work on the film article and the redirect can be reversed (with content and history returned) when WP:NF is met. In the meanwhile, you could always continue building on the film article in a user sandbox. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.