Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laserfiche (5th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Laserfiche

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is written like an advertisement and has not been significantly improved since the last time it was nominated. The sources are mostly from their own website. A WP:BEFORE search could not find any WP:SIGCOV. Also fails WP:NCORP. Lightoil (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Products, and California. Lightoil (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete five AfD! New record. I don't find sourcing that we can use, it's all PR stuff. Oaktree b (talk) 00:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Company is incredible at marketing itself, PR newswires for about 6 hits, BR newswire for about as many, and a story in the Financial Post which is a PR news article reprint. Utterly non-notable. I'd suggest SALT at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 01:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt FIVE AfDs? Enough is enough - we have clearly been skirting WP:NCORP for years now, dining off low participation and no consensus. PR, routine announcements, it doesn't belong here. The 2nd Nomination discussion will make your head blow up. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning delete, per the absence of independent reliable sources providing in-depth coverage of the subject. BD2412 T 01:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.