Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lasco, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus at this time, and don't think another relist will do much good. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lasco, California

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another spot on the ex-NCO Railway line, the only indication I have of anything there is this Forest Service newsletter which states that there was a lumbering camp there in the e 1920s. Myrick appears to document the same, at greater length, but not being able to read the passages in full I cannot tell whether he says much more in toto. At any rate the evidence is that this wasn't a settlement; whether it is notable for having a lumber camp on the site, I will leave to others to discuss. Mangoe (talk) 03:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - I found a writeup about this place and community here that I'll add a bit from, to improve the article with. http://www.tipurdy.org/camp-lasco/ Goldenrowley (talk) 18:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have come across Purdy's site several times of late. My problems here are two: first, it appears to be a self-published site, so I've been reluctant to use it as a source. Second, we're back to the issue of "not a town". Logging camps are, by their nature, seasonal if semi-permanent, and even Purdy's text doesn't make it clear how much the camp and the spot on the railroad should be identified as the same place. I'm more ambivalent about this case than some of the others, but realize that it's going to change to being "Lasco was a stop on the railroad where there was a logging camp for a time," which may fail to satisfy others' notions of what is notable, especially considering how one must stretch for sourcing. Mangoe (talk) 19:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to WP:SHOUT your vote, please. We can read the bold vote just fine. Reywas92^Talk 19:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seasonal logging camp, not a notable town/community. Reywas92^Talk 19:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I've done some work on the article, I think its a notable location, and its better to have this content in its own article instead of in a subsection of Lassen_County,_California#Communities. While seasonal, it was populated for eight years, and families lived there. I don't have a newspapers.com subscription right now, but I do see the Lassen newspaper has some more articles on it that someone might add as references. It is a notable part of the history of the region.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 21:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.