Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lascaux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was fun over. (non-admin closure) --TL22 (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lascaux

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as this fails WP:TOOSOON Sheepythemouse (talk) 13:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:DENY. --Gimubrc (talk) 14:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep You can't be serious. This is the most famous site in the world for cave paintings. There are numerous books and scores or hundreds of scientific articles. This cave and its remarkable paintings have been studied for decades. TimidGuy (talk) 14:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not think he is serious (read the nomination rationale carefully). The real AfD tag in the article could have been avoided, though (WP:FOOLS). Tigraan (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, got me. : ) TimidGuy (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the above. Seriously, who looks at cave paintings?! epicgenius @ 17:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC) (talk) 17:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.