Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Helgeson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lars Helgeson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy biographical notability or general notability. Most of the references are not independent. Google search turns up nothing that has been independently written about him, but the usual vanity hits of what he and GreenRope have written. (Google search also finds another Lars Helgeson, but they are clearly different people.) Robert McClenon (talk) 03:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the section on his career is too fully of buzz words and promotionalism. Even if we could find a way to fix this flaw, there is just no sign that he is notable. Wikipedia is not Linkedin, and that is exactly what this article reads like.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:59, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 04:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 04:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 04:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 04:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.