Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larryboy: The Cartoon Adventures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW, clear consensus to Keep has been established, nom has expanded the article and added his Weak keep !vote here in the debate. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 19:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Larryboy: The Cartoon Adventures

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to prove WP:N and WP:RS Yoshiman6464 (talk) 00:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Small and seemingly discontinued VT spin-off strand, but still notable enough to clinch WP:N in my eyes as it was released for consumption in some form. Nate • (chatter) 01:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

in looking beyond the article:

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

production:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

distributor:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DVD title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep as having been nominated for a Golden Reel Award and having established a separate notability. Needs work not deletion. YSchmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - pretty clearly notable. Fieari (talk) 07:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This series is sufficiently notable. Additional references should be entered in the article. --Dcirovic (talk) 11:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - I added additional references to the article regarding its reception, especially its nomination for the Golden Reel Award. However, the article still needs additional references. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 19:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.