Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry harriet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfy and delete. Mailer Diablo 12:35, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Larry harriet

nn (Google search yields 676); subject appears to be user M1ss1ontomars2k4 05:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think thats right. Just because someone doesn't have a direct "claim to fame" doesn't mean that they don't do good work, and there is absolutely no reason why this page should be deleted. Larry Harriet is very popular among the Court TV message board. He deserves to be included in Wikipedia's database. Thankyou for taking the time!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryharriet (talk • contribs)

Delete. Mr. Intrepid Legal Journalist doesn't even have his own domain name for "CourtNet", and I'm not finding any other sign resembling notability. --Calton | Talk 05:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Userfy nn, vanity. Very popular on a message board does not mean notable. Fan1967 05:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't think a user page can hold this ego. Gazpacho 05:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or userfy per Fan-1967 and Gazpacho, the most vain autobiography I've seen. Royboy crashfan 06:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy. Subject doesn't appear to satisfy WP:BIO. dbtfz^talk 06:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Geogre's Law is confirmed yet again. :-) dbtfz ^talk 06:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or possibly userfy. Claim to notability is activity in a message board. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 06:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, or userfy --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 09:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy as vanity ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 10:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or userfy. Per Royboy, this might be the most vain vanity bio ever. --Deville (Talk) 12:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and userfy, vanity, nn. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and userfy per above. --Khoikhoi 19:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT DELETE, USER HAS VALID PTS.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.