Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Lawton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ged UK 11:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Lawton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

regardless of any possible notability , this is essentially an advertisement for Lawton and his crime prevention business . I know it's odd to say an article highlighting the subject's multiple convictions as a thief is promotional, but in this case it is, because those are his credentials. DGG ( talk ) 00:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Multiple in-depth sources across multiple decades; notable as one of the most notorious jewel thiefs in US history and as a prison reformer. Could use some trimming in the career section if seen as too much though. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 15:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 18:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 18:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article is PROMO; it is tagged and editors are free to edit it for tone, and to let out some of the hot air and violating of WP:UNDUE. However, there are so many RS profiles, interviews and feature stories about Lawton in major media on the page, sourced to major media , that deletion is inappropriate.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the subject is clearly notable. The issue of the promotional language is nothing that cannot be fixed. Ya sh ! 07:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.