Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Householder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Northern Antarctica (₵) 03:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Householder[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only cited source is a namecheck. Guy (Help!) 23:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:POLITICIAN as a member of the Ohio House of Representatives. --Jakob (talk) 00:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:POLITICIAN. Former Speaker of a state House of Representatives. Next time, consider following WP:BEFORE. A simple Google search shows ample substantial RS coverage for this person, enough to satisfy WP:GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Former Speaker of a state House of Representatives. Meets WP:POLITICIAN. No ambiguity that this subject is and meets the notability criteria. 50.181.214.118 (talk) 01:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If a person has been elected to and served in a state/provincial/territorial/federal legislature, then per WP:POLITICIAN they're always a valid article topic — and thus even a single "namecheck" source which properly confirms that fact is sufficient to start an article with. Tag for {{refimprove}}, by all means, but keep as a duly elected holder of a notable political office. Bearcat (talk) 03:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per others. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 13:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and WP:SNOW close. Meets WP:NPOL on spec, and even if it's not currently in the article there's more than enough coverage out there to meet WP:GNG. --ElHef (Meep?) 15:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.