Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laptop (2008 film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Laptop (2008 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.
References: One negative REDIFF review. Kolma8 (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep as has at least one full national review. That the review is negative has nothing at all to do with notability it just shows that the review is independent criticism, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 02:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: also reviewed by The Times of India here, meeting WP:NFILM. 2pou (talk) 08:06, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - two reviews is good enough for me Spiderone 09:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per two RS reviews. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep 2 reviews passes WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 02:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.