Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laos youth and young adult's church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laos youth and young adult's church[edit]

Contested speedy. The nomination is simply that this is a non notable Christian youth set up that fails WP:ORG by a long way Nuttah (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete ditto above 68.193.214.237 (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to the lack of citations from reliable sources which are a requirement for the article to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge a short summary to Nunhead. This is usually the best solution for churches of limited notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per User:Peterkingiron. X MarX the Spot (talk) 06:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have to disagree with the merge, I cannot find any reliable sources (by way of google news) to help to verify the church, without those sources, the article's content could be seen as original research from a person who lives near the subject of the article. — ^.^ ^{[citation needed]} 11:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could not find any reliable sources and the article itself is completely unsourced already. Possible OR. --Banime (talk) 15:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources and possible OR. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 20:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Any reliable sources issues can be dealt with a citation request in the merged article. JASpencer (talk) 08:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.