Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langtoft Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Langtoft, Lincolnshire#Education. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Langtoft Primary School[edit]

Nothing encyclopedic, no 3d-party references, no assertion of notability, tagged since 9/07 w/o improvement. Possible merge to Lincolnshire, but there really isn't any content. THF (talk) 13:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Langtoft, Lincolnshire#Education. I have already merged the limited encyclopaedic information. TerriersFan (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect, as suggested by TerriersFan. Article does not assert the school's notability as a topic separate from the village, but information about the school can enrich the article about the village. I note that the article does cite an offline third-party reference, namely LANGTOFT A Portrait of South Lincolnshire Village, by Jean Thomas and Diana Branch. There may be more information that could be added to the village article (in addition to what TerriersFan added there). --Orlady (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Langtoft, Lincolnshire#Education, reducing the text to one or two paragraphs, instead of the present bullet point list. Delete list of heads. TerriersFan's present merged text is in my view raterh too brief. WP does not usually have articles on primary schools, but material on them can conveniently be included in village articles. The local hisotry book should certainly be cited in the distination article. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.