Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lands Of Hope Redemption

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. See also the AfD of Lands of Hope which closed delete j⚛e decker ^talk 02:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lands Of Hope Redemption

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N and WP:V: non-notable video game with no references based on reliable, third-party published sources. The single third-party source (Cliqist) is an unreliable PR piece. A search using the WikiProject Video games custom Google search for "Lands Of Hope Redemption" found 0 results. (Custom Google search results are currently on the spam blacklist so you'll have to search yourself.) Less restrictive Google searches only turned up the usual unreliable/press release type of sources. Woodroar (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 16:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Woodroar stated my opinion quite well. 331dot (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Selective merge to home article, Lands of Hope. The original game was barely notable - the "new" one fails WP:GNG, but could at least be mentioned as part of original the panda ₯’ 09:52, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. That home article is about to be deleted as well for the same reasons. But while that topic has one WP:VG/RS hit, this has none. The topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources (?) enough to build a full article. No suitable merge targets. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ♔ 16:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.