Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landovmyk, South Australia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Per WP:G12. As a copy of a Wikipedia page without attribution, it violates the copyright of the authors of that page. SoWhy 13:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Landovmyk, South Australia[edit]
- Landovmyk, South Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ironbank, South Australia has not been renamed Landovmyk and already has an article which was redirected to this page. No sources to verify the new name, fails WP:V, WP:RS and appears to be a WP:HOAX. JD554 (talk) 09:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —JD554 (talk) 10:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete vandalism. Melburnian (talk) 11:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete not known at Geoscience Australia Placename search - Land of Mick/Myk/... Hoax. -- Paul foord (talk) 11:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as a copyvio of Ironbank, South Australia as it appears to be a copy and paste without proper attribution. So tagged. If name change can be confirmed page should be moved and edited. This is an editorial decision so no need for deletion processes. Dpmuk (talk) 12:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.