Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lance Lambert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 08:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lance Lambert[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced Biography for over 18 months, with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources able to be found. Lots of coverage in blogs and related organisations, so I may have missed something, so if references are able to be found, then I'm OK for the article to remain. The-Pope (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Delete per nomination. --Ozgod (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. J04n(talk page) 19:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. less than 20 cites on GS for his books. Not enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:18, 29 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. I remember reading one of his books years ago, so I had a look for sources, but I likewise can't find sufficient to justify keeping the article. In any case this WP article is just a copy of his own text about himself, e.g. as provided to the non-copyright website that I've just added as a citation. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Ariconte (talk) 22:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.