Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lameass - A Jackass Parody

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lameass - A Jackass Parody[edit]

Non notable web based video. As far as I can tell this is essentially a vanity entry. The Bethling 04:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i don't think it should be deleted because it has over 5,000 views and 2 installments so far, which is good enough to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dagrimdialer619 (talk • contribs)
- I don't think so, Tim. Delete Danny Lilithborne 05:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: User:Dagrimdialer619 is apparently the creator of the video series that is the topic of the article. DMacks 06:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, don't see the notability of this video -- Samir धर्म 04:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, violates WP:Vanity and possibly WP:WEB. It is on Google Video, but that doesn't count because anyone can put something up there. TJ Spyke 04:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Every parody or web-video doesn't need its own page. Also, 5000 views isn't that great (nor is that stat alone a good indication of worth)...youtube has dozens of steve irwin tributes slapped together that have gotten a 10-20K views in the past day. DMacks 04:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We'll relly punk them if we delete it, but seriously it does need to be deleted. Buckner 1986 06:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non-notable. 205.157.110.11 08:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:WEB and likely WP:VANITY, falls under the purview of Yet Another Google/YouTube VideoTM. --Kinu ^t/_c 14:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Utterly NN. Cain Mosni 16:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
strong delete per above --mathewguiver 18:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "EXTERMINATE!" thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Fenton. –– Lid^(Talk) 11:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.