Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lambertseter Upper Secondary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Withdrawing nomination. ❤ Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 14:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lambertseter Upper Secondary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NGO. ❤ Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 17:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Schools are kept regardless!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Are you serious? Why should this particular article be deleted when we have a lot of articles on other Norwegian (upper secondary) schools? Take a look at Fagerborg Upper Secondary School. The article consists of only two sentences, still it has been existing since 2006. I want to know what makes "my" article less relevant compared to let's say Berg Upper Secondary School or Oslo Cathedral School? Do not they all belong to the same category? If it is of no relevance to Wikipedia then why do we have so many articles on other Norwegian (or any country, for that sake) schools, both on this English version and other versions of Wikipedia? Going by your logic all articles found in Category:Secondary_schools_in_Norway should be deleted. As far as relevance is concerned, I do not see any issue. Yes, the article is surely a stub, but it contains all the basic information. Anyways that is a whole different matter. I want a good explanation for the unfair nomination for deletion. Sandip90 (talk) 21:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per longstanding consensus that high schools of confirmed existence (as this is) are treated the same way as cities, rivers, highways, and professional athletes and presumed notable. Carrite (talk) 03:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.