Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalan Choubey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lalan Choubey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, formatted like a résumé rather than an encyclopedia article and not adequately referenced, about a person notable primarily as a trade unionist and political organizer. While the trade union work might be a valid notability claim if it could be sourced properly, it's not an automatic inclusion freebie that guarantees him a Wikipedia article just because he exists -- but the sourcing here consists of two "references" to his own self-published social networking profiles, and two glancing namechecks of his existence in newspaper articles about other things. This is not the kind of sourcing needed to make someone notable enough for an encyclopedia article — he needs to be referenced to media coverage about him, not just to namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things or to his own social networking profiles — and even if it were properly sourced it would still have to be rewritten in an encyclopedic format rather than a résumé format. Bearcat (talk) 17:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 17:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 17:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily delete - Posting facebook & twitter refs as sources is an insult to wikipedia. The user should be punished I think. And, one trivial mention in a newspaper doesn't prove notability. Makhamakhi (talk) 15:45, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not Linkedin.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sourced provided but does not mean to deserve a page in Wikipedia in term of notability. Fails WP:ANYBIO. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.