Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalaloopsy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lalaloopsy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a non-notable line of toys. The only possibly useful reference I see is from a trade publication, and does not really establish notability. The article has been highly promotional in nature at times, listing the entire line with excessive details. LadyofShalott 20:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. there is nothing notable here at all. — Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 20:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - I didn't see anything notable on Google, Google News and Yahoo that would be appropriate for Wikipedia, this small mention here wouldn't be enough for the article. SwisterTwister talk 21:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. No sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH and no evidence any even exist. Msnicki (talk) 20:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.