Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Palmer (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Palmer

The article is obviously not encyclopedically written, but aside from that, I don't think the documentary about this man provides notability to him. Perhaps an article could be written about the documentary, but it would have to be done so from scratch, so there's no point in keeping this here. Note that the previous AfD was about an article on a completely different topic (a puddle in Ohio). Chick Bowen 02:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The fact that a person was seen in a television documentary does not convey automatic notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's sad, he got conned, he was on TV, but that doesn't make him notable. JohnCD (talk) 15:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.