Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Bodom (2016 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Bodom (2016 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find anything to show that this film is ultimately notable enough for an article. ~~It says that it was supposed to have been released to YouTube back in March, but I have to assume that this is a typo and is meant to refer to March 2017~~, so it's something that hasn't released yet.

I wish the director well, but this film just isn't notable at this point in time. It's difficult for films to pass WP:NFILM and WP:NFF, let alone when it's an indie film by a young filmmaker, but there doesn't seem to have been any coverage for this in independent and reliable sources per WP:RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: I forgot that the US styles their dates differently, so the film will release in December of this year. The overall issue of notability is still a factor, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - films self-released on YouTube don't satisfy WP:MOVIE unless they've been independently profiled by reliable sources. This article is WP:TOOSOON at best. Blythwood (talk) 02:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NMOVIE. Self-promotional. NO reliable source. A strong suspicion that the creator of this article also created the IMDB page, which shows exactly why IMDB is not considered a reliable source. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 04:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Even in the best case scenario this is too soon, but the lack of any notability is the clincher. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:TOOSOON at best! --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:40, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.