Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to Nexstar Broadcasting Group. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lakana[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rely only on repeated sources. Article is written only for company promotional and advertising purposes. References are very poor. No significant coverage by independent media. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 14:05, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete as it stands - they feel like they should be notable, but the evidence isn't here - David Gerard (talk) 16:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Several minutes of research yielded enough substantial coverage in WP:RS to meet WP:GNG, including this and this. Safehaven86 (talk) 02:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and then Redirect if needed, as the two listed sources above are essentially simply local news stating the local company's activities, none of that would substantiate a convincing article and the one thing listed is that the company article is in fact acceptable, therefore this company is likely best connected to that said company. SwisterTwister talk 02:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
REDIRECT to parent company Nexstar Broadcasting Group. The coverage I'm finding about Lakana is just under the borderline for WP:CORP.[1][2] I'd probably be swayed to go KEEP if more significant independent coverage turns up. Until then, this company is already mentioned on Nexstar Broadcasting Group and further expansion can take place there, if people so desire. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 18:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to parent company Nexstar Broadcasting Group. The article is overly promotional as it stands and the subject lacks individual notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.