Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lahu churches
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 06:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Lahu churches[edit]
Survived a vfd cause noone voted. Article is unencyclopedic and unverified, delete--Peta 02:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Hobbeslover talk/contribs 04:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 06:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete SM247 06:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Paddles TC 07:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as proposal. michaelCurtis talk+ contributions 09:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep
current article is poorly written, I'm going to try a fix. It probably will entail a rename.I've done a complete rewrite and replaced all article text - every sentence is now derived from a cited (or linked) source. The rename is needed, but I didn't have time for it. Part of the problem is the systemic bias of the internet. The Lahu are a generally rural ethnic group in an area of the world where there is limited internet acces. And, of course, the Christian portion in China would have even less access to the internet than most Chinese do. But, as per Christianity Today, Christian Lahu churches have been around since before World War II. GRBerry 02:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply] - KeepGRBerry has re-written artcle. Now seems to be a factual article about a small but interesting Christian denomination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Johnson (talk • contribs)
- Keep The rewritten article by GRBerry is a useful contribution to the encyclopaedia. Lahu Christianity itself is notable as an example of the complex links between religion and ethnic identity. Ngio 13:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.