Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladybird Hill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect. to List of characters in King of the Hill Secret account 23:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ladybird Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of King of the Hill through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the coverage in List of characters in King of the Hill is enough detail on the character. TTN (talk) 22:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- Merge to [[Hank Hill] It's his dog. Does throw a light upon his character, but inappropriate for a separate article. Not everything possible makes much sense as a separate article. It helps to be reasonable on all sides. DGG (talk) 04:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect. I personally think it would fit better into List of characters in King of the Hill, but I think we all agree that there simply isn't a point in having a separate article for this fictional, unimportant pet dog. DARTH PANDAduel 14:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The dog? Are you serious? HiDrNick! 23:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to Hank Hill This is Hank Hill's dog, but it does not need a separate article on it's own, as he is not that notable. It would be better for it to be included into Hank's character page rather than it's own. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 03:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as mere trivia. Eusebeus (talk) 04:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.