Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Sophia Taylor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted (G3) by RHaworth. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lady Sophia Taylor[edit]
- Lady Sophia Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
{Person does not exist Szndav8 (talk) 20:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - this royal person most certainly exists; this nomination is in bad faith. Whether she's notable is another question. She's the second cousin of Prince William. Bearian (talk) 23:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find any evidence of this person on the net. Does not appear on http://thepeerage.com/p10558.htm#i105577, and it should know Porturology (talk) 02:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This person appears to be a hoax. The persons who are described as being her older brothers and younger sisters are all listed here and here. But she herself isn't. This leads me to doubt the subject's existence. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:24, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.