Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Nicholas Windsor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Nicholas Windsor

Non-notable. No accomplishments. Mostly a rather subjective description of lineage. What little is of value can be added to her husband Lord Nicholas Windsor's article. Today's 24 hours 01:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to have done nothing apart from lay bogus claim to relation to the extinct Frankopan. Since anyone can do that, she's not notable. Bigdaddy1981 01:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete We do not decide whether to keep an article based on bloodlines, but on reliable and independent secondary sources covering the subject. Per [1] the Croatian Nobility Society denied these Frankopan-come-latelies membership on account of their just deciding one day to assume the noble name Frankopan (in place of their own lesser Noble Name Delupis). The Lady married into the British royal family (although hubby gave up any chance of assuming the Crown when he became a Catholic so he could marry the woman he loved). This achieved a bare smattering of coverage in independent and reliable sources, not quite satisfying WP:N and WP:BIO. Edison 15:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Rackabello 03:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the relevant information is already in husband's article (making it a bit of a WP:COATRACK, actually). --Dhartung | Talk 05:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect. Thin Arthur 08:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: no need to redirect. Any info. of value already manually transferred to husband's article. Check it out and update as needed. Thanks. Today's 24 hours 15:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Bucketsofg 20:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. Bearian 20:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.