Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Meskah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Meskah[edit]

Lady Meskah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been tagged for copyvio Kottu investigation since last April (2014) (see previous version here) and my searches found nothing to suggest improvement and considering there's never been much improvement or even information. Pinging Namiba and Fayenatic london. SwisterTwister talk 23:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The article consists of two lines copied from EternalEgypt.org, a site which is used for a few other citations in Wikipedia but does not seem to be particularly reliable. I cannot find any corroborating sources, so the claim at the cited page that she is "One of the most famous women of Egyptian Islamic history" does not seem valid. – Fayenatic London 15:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note: the same editor created Khawand Toghay from the same source page, but I have been able to verify that one from other sources. – Fayenatic London 15:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a complete copyvio of [1]. --Biblioworm 15:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.