Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Duracell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Duracell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to fail all notability requirements - the claims of notability are all underwhelming (worked on non-notable radio stations; placed at 4th and 57th in two polls conducted by non-notable organisations; released a white-label test-pressing record which charted on a non-notable single store chart; formed a partnership with a non-notable brand) and, critically, I can find nothing in reliable third-party sources about her. RichardOSmith (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Underwhelming is a matter of opinion; I didn't see underwhelming in the guidelines.

  • Click the "books" tab, she has been written about.
  • If HMV is non-notable; why does it have its own Wikipedia page?

and why did the no1 uk garage DJ collect his award?.

I would like a little more info before you delete, and it gets recreated.

Yas at NewMatter (talk) 21:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.