Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady-K Da Prophetess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lady-K Da Prophetess

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only sources are unreliable blogs, no reliable independent sources. Notability not evident. WWGB (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:40, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did a search for the full stage name and received no hits other than this Wikipedia page. A search for her name brings up some other stage names (Lady K, K-Prodigy) but that didn't bring up anything either. The article is phrased just enough to where it probably can't be speedied, but the lack of notability here is fairly clear. I can't find any coverage of her in reliable sources. There are junk hits, blog hits, unusable sources and some primary sources, but nothing usable in the slightest. I wish her well, but she just doesn't pass notability guidelines at this point in time. It's just way, way WP:TOOSOON from what I can see. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I would have speedied this as spam/non-notable if it hadn't been nommed here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and is probably spam. No credible sources found. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.