Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladislav pl. Kiš

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ladislav pl. Kiš[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1850 politician/official at the sub-county level in Croatia. I am unable to find evidence that he passes Notability guidelines. The article only has a single ref (I didn't evaluate whether it's RS), with only a passing mention that this person existed. I attempted to search for more info, and I was unable to find any sources with more than a passing mention. Maybe someone can dig up meaningful sourcing in Croatian, but that seems improbable given the date and sub-county position. Alsee (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Alsee (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Alsee (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even among modern politicians whose press coverage Googles well, serving at the county (or below) level of political office is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass just because the person can be single-sourced as existing. If somebody could dig out enough archival sourcing to verify that this person is special somehow, then that might make a difference here — but one local history website namechecking his existence once in a historical timeline is not in and of itself enough. Bearcat (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Bearcat. This minor politician with one minor source clearly does not meet WP:NPOL. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:27, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.