Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lachlan Robinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 02:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lachlan Robinson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a schoolboy sportsman who shows promise but who does not meet Wikipedia's standards for notability of Australian Rules Footballers. He hasn't yet played in a professional league. Robinson may one day be notable as a sportsman, but isn't yet. Prod contested, so bringing here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 06:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per above; I'm in that age level, and know hundreds of people that may be notable one day, clearly aren't now. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 08:50, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable as far as I can tell. Also creator seems to have a conflict of interest in the article. --Marjaliisa (talk) 10:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. May be one day. But not now. Johnlp (talk) 23:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ATH. created by single purpose editor, probably his dad. LibStar (talk) 00:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, non-notable bio should have been tagged with db-person. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 02:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - also fails WP:CRIN notability requirements. Non-notable. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 10:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Kid who isn't notable as a footballer or cricketer, also no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Jenks24 (talk) 14:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Chuckle - from an earlier version: "Robinson has modeled his batting technique on Rahul Dravid, as many talk about Dravid's 'textbook' batting technique. Robinson also has a textbook technique just like Dravid's." :-D AssociateAffiliate (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.