Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laboratory for Analysis and Architecture of Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nom withdrawn. Randykitty (talk) 08:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Laboratory for Analysis and Architecture of Systems[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2013. Only claim to fame in the article is being "located near to other important higher education facilities". CNRS laboratories are very often created only temporarily (they have a 5-year mandate which usually can be extended only twice). More importantly, a Google search and a Google news search turn up what may be expected: articles published by lab members listing the lab as their affiliation and a handful of newspaper articles about accomplishments of lab members mentioning the lab in passing, but no in-depth coverage of the lab itself. Unless significant independent sources can be found elsewhere: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 15:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: (COI disclosure: I did my Ph.D there in 2005–2008) This is a Carnot Institute and AFAIK the largest CNRS (public research) lab in France, so even though the current version of the article isn't more than a stub, it seems to me that we can come up with enough sourceable content for an article. I still have a few contacts there so I'm going to reach out to them to see if they can help me gather some materials and references. guillom 21:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The lab was founded in 1968 according to this. Significant coverage in Le Monde. Some other things with more than passing mentions [1], [2], [3], [4]. Vrac (talk) 22:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep on the basis of the additional information supplied above. DGG ( talk ) 05:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn. Thanks Vrac for finding those sources. --Randykitty (talk) 08:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.