Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Luce di Vita
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 09:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- La Luce di Vita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Declining speedy deletion, taking to AfD per http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Italy&oldid=286085658#Hoaxes.3F. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating the following two pages, created at about the same time, also asserted to be hoax Italian soap operas, despite the fact that one title is Spanish:
- Mundo de Mentiras (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- La Famiglia dei Furfanti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 20:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And another one: Jaula de Lobos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 20:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All My attempts to find evidence verifying these soap operas has been fruitless... wihch shouldn't be the case given the grand claims in the articles. Townlake (talk) 01:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.