Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Démence du boxeur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

La Démence du boxeur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 14:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The book won the Prix Renaudot in 1992. The corresponding article in French amply demonstrates notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain. As a winner of the Prix Renaudot, this book satisfies criteria 2 of the guideline WP:NBOOK. James500 (talk) 06:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per both Eastmain and James500. Yet another AfD where the nom had no idea of the notability of the topic, didn't perform WP:BEFORE yet semi-bot created it anyway. --Oakshade (talk) 01:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:NBOOK as winning the Pri Renaudot is a significant award. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.