Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LOL SUPERMAN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LOL SUPERMAN

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has no citations to prove notability, and this seems to be WP:Original research. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 20:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 20:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 20:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I went and tried to find something to support this article but wasn't able to. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article is completely unsourced, and most of the information appears to either be original research or "information" from social media or other non-reliable sources. Searches did not turn up any actual coverage in reliable sources on this. Rorshacma (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It seems pretty much established that the video itself is a hoax and I don't see much evidence that it is a notable hoax. Pichpich (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Whatever this is, I've not found anything about it... Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to zero sourcing provided to back the article's claims. TH1980 (talk) 01:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sourcing, definitely seems to be a hoax. The only outside link provided claims it came from a poster on 4chan, which is a notoriously unreliable website. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ -- "LOL Superman" lacks reliable, verifiable sources to establish the notability of the alleged video (WP:RS, WP:V). The content is based on hearsay, forum posts, and social media, which do not meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable information. The subject is also potentially a hox (WP:HOAX) and fails to meet the genseral notability guideline (WP:GNG) due to the absence of significant coverage in independent and reliable secondary sources. (none)

Cray04 (talk) 04:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom "LOL Superman" lacks reliable, verifiable sources to establish the notability of the alleged video (WP:RS, WP:V). The content is based on hearsay, forum posts, and social media, which do not meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable information. The subject is also potentially a hox (WP:HOAX) and fails to meet the genseral notability guideline (WP:GNG) due to the absence of significant coverage in independent and reliable secondary sources. (none)

Cray04 (talk) 04:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glitched, and wasn't showing vote. Struck out the duplicate vote. Cray04 (talk) 04:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.