Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LIXI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 18:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LIXI[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced self-advertisement for a non-notable organization. Damiens.rf 17:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added a good reference from the government of Australia, and also referenced a WP:RS blog from Microsoft that says that they joined LIXI. I also removed verbiage. Unscintillating (talk) 03:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added more references, clearly notable. --Pontificalibus (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.