Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L.A. Percussion Rentals
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Emil Richards. MBisanz talk 00:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- L.A. Percussion Rentals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete, to my interpretation of WP:CORP this fails notability guidelines and is advertisement in my opinion. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- To the above contributor: If you have ever been to LAPR's facilities in LA, or to any of their music events (including hosting private concerts for CalArts renowned faculty and graduates, you'd have a different perspective. Off the top of my head, I can remember these notable people personally visiting/performing at LAPR: Emil Richards, Evelyn Glennie, Remo Belli, Michel Gondry...and supplying the percussion instruments for national and international tours (Sting, Star Wars in Concert...), as well as popular musicians such as Beck (for recording) and dozens of others I can't remember. In fact, Apple rented LAPR instruments for some of its sounds a few years ago. If there is some wording that needs to be changed, fine. But this article references publications and warrants an article, considering it's one of the most impressive commercial percussion collections on the West Coast and/or USA. ThirdCritical (talk) 00:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3B61:4B0:ECA2:5EB4:F319:C6C5 (talk) — 2602:306:3B61:4B0:ECA2:5EB4:F319:C6C5 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Merge into Emil Richards. The company in and of itself fails WP:CORP but is significant in the sense of Richards' notability and extensive collection. Faustus37 (talk) 05:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:03, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:CORP. §FreeRangeFrog 00:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Emil Richards Fails WP:CORP, a company is not notable because it is owned by someone notable or because notable people have worked/performed or simply been there:(notability is neither inherent nor inherited. besiegedtalk 18:37, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Emil Richards. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.