Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lü Gong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Battle of Xiangyang (191). Content, if any is desired to be merged, can be merged from history with proper attribution. If other Lü Gongs who might be notable turn up, the redirect can be turned into a dab page. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lü Gong[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This historical person is not notable enough to have a specific article on him. He was the subject of only a few lines in an annotation in the historical text Records of the Three Kingdoms, which briefly mentions his role in the death of Sun Jian. (又云：劉表將呂公將兵緣山向堅，堅輕騎尋山討公。公兵下石。中堅頭，應時腦出物故。其不同如此也。) As the creator of this article, I nominate it for deletion. LDS _{contact me} 16:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 16:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge / redirect to Battle of Xiangyang (191), which appears to be Lu Gong's moment of significance. --Lockley (talk) 19:00, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect is not unreasonable. However, deletion would be a better choice because there might be other significant persons who share the same name. LDS _{contact me} 10:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:54, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.