Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylie minogue unreleased songs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted This is a clear cut'n'paste of User:Tlogmer/Kylie that wasn't created by the author who has been creating it. For example formatting lost. Lets not waste our time here. WP:CSD#G6. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wangi (talk • contribs)

Kylie minogue unreleased songs[edit]

A7 speedy declined, unsourced indiscriminate list with no indication of why it is notable. Rodhullandemu (Talk) 01:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. Toddst1 (talk) 01:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced, nn, unreadable, unencyclopedic list. JJL (talk) 01:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sources, not wikified (which makes it hard to read). Macy (talk) 01:24, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no WP:RS. Everything else could be fixed, lack of RS is fatal. – ukexpat (talk) 01:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Useless, unwikified list. This Would be better. Thedjatclubrock :-) ^(T/C) 01:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cant really read it. Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 02:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. --Rtphokie (talk) 02:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unreadable and unreferenced. Luk suh 02:05, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unclear,don't understand what is written about, makes no patental nonsense.--Freewayguy (Webmail) 02:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Canley (talk) 02:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: seems there is some relation to User:Tlogmer/Kylie? /wangi (talk) 02:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced ramblings on mostly non-notablle songs, indiscriminate list. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete even if the article was written well (and it isn't) the topic would be somewhat disputable. Pundit|utter 03:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.