Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylie's 10th Studio Album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 00:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kylie's 10th Studio Album

WP:CRYSTAL, the majority of the text is unconfirmed hearsay, the references are not accessible without a login, and, with a login, turn out to be self-referential ("A rumoured track for Kylie's 'comeback' album, stated on Wikipedia.") or just confirming that it's all rumours ("Rumoured track title...", "Rumoured to have been written with Boy George..."). Images are untagged. Poorly written. Propose deletion until album is actually released (or a whole lot more certain than it is now). --Plek 01:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Canley 02:52, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't think that it is good to delete this file since many people don't know about Kylie's new album — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.166.26.21 (talk • contribs) --Plek 10:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge content any current content that is at all confirmable should be moved to the artist's main page until there is sufficent sources and evidence to make a seperate article. Kazmarov 03:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In response to the anonymous contributor, the purpose of Wikipedia is not necessarily to let people know about unreleased albums. All the information comes from Kylie's own website, which is not sufficient per WP:RS for an unreleased album that the public can't see. YechielMan 03:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Content will warrant an article eventually, but not now. Jmlk17 07:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:CRYSTAL and all that. I could swear an article on this very same topic has been swatted down before, too. Lankiveil 09:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete until we have a name for it and some certain information. Capitalistroadster 03:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, [1] appears to be the only reliable-ish source for the article. I dont mind speculative articles provided the speculation is attributed. John Vandenberg 09:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.