Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle O'Brien

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 08:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle O'Brien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Discussed briefly at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Kyle O'Brien which gives some background. Fram (talk) 07:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 07:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 07:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 07:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG, as the two non-primary sources only mention him briefly and are of non-FPL leagues anyways, and WP:NFOOTY, as NISA is not yet considered a fully professional league (and in any case, even if the league were to pass the FPL for the upcoming season, the first "season" of NISA was functionally a poorly attended, poorly covered tournament featuring two groups of four teams playing a total of six games, and one team folded nearly immediately, so playing in only one game of this tournament should not satisfy our guidelines, even though the WP:GNG fail means it should be irrelevant anyways.) SportingFlyer T·C 08:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:36, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.