Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Davey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Davey[edit]

article lacks notability, lacks 3rd party references and reads more like a resume then a biographical article. Bidgee (talk) 04:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Bidgee (talk) 04:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article is blatantly ~~self-~~promotional and needs a drastic overhaul, however looking through all that I think the subject may actually be notable as a dancer. If independent, reliable sources can be found I would be willing to keep this, but not as it is at present. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 04:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I had a good look at this and the NECB which seems to be a minor dance company that lost its funding last year. Subject is apparently a member of the dance team there, but not especially notable at this time. 2 films, 1 independent and not yet released, 1 not yet in production. Perhaps this will be a little more notable in 12 months time once reviews and reliable sources can be provided. –Moondyne 04:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Moondyne's analysis without prejudice to a later inclusion if and when reliable sources are available. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 05:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Save the article has good cause to stay, its relevant to dancers and to people who understand art — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firesigns (talk • contribs) 05:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)— Firesigns (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete. Future notability doesn't pass. And having roles in a movie doesn't make you notable. Having significant roles in significant movies does Note that another actor in the upcoming film is also in AfD WP:Articles for deletion/Leigh Alderson. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Save im sorry , but these all sound like , especially the last comment, all quite bitter...! i do believe the roles are significant and i have on good authority to let you know that the other independent film has been premiered in the uk for which the said person is the star of. And second of all the second person Alderson, IS a celebrity in Ireland with three BBC documentaries charting his life as well as the movie and independent film. They are worthy enough to grant him a wikipedia page due to a lot of irish backing and interest in his story! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.70.252 (talk • contribs) 08:32, 16 July 2009 (UTC)— 81.96.70.252 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Perhaps you should look again. This discussion is about Kyle Davey, not Leigh Alderson. I did NOT register a delete !vote in that AfD discussion. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep why on earth would you rid more articles about artists and the arts, especially ballet! are you kidding, in response to mattibgn, why dont you help the article instead of just getting rid of it?! and moondyne, New English Contemporary Ballet got extremely rave reviews from all the major spreads and major mags The Dancing Times and Dance Europe included, although im not sure how much they put up on their web pages, otherwise it would be pointless them releasing a mag, but i will try and get a hold of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.70.252 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 16 July 2009 (UTC)— 81.96.70.252 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: The above IP has already !voted in this discussion. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

note but you did bring his name up in this conversation! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.70.252 (talk) 09:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)— 81.96.70.252 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Yes, I did. It is common practice to link closely related AfD's. But keep avoiding the fact that you are talking about the wrong person and have tried to vote twice. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

note actually i havent. i live with three other people and they were around when i did this, i spoke to them and they took it apon themselves to write what they thought.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.70.252 (talk) 04:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the old "someone else used my computer" excuse......then you can see why creating an account would make sense....or remove your excuse. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:13, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

how old exactly are you? im guessing under 21? we have a comunal computer in our house, as its easier as we are all doctors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.70.252 (talk) 15:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.