Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kya Tum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:38, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kya Tum[edit]

Kya Tum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film with no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:27, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:27, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Movie is released in October 2018 and has references for evidence of same. You can check one of the references [1]

References

  1. ^ "Kya Tum: This October Get Ready For A New Sensational Murder Mystery!". koimoi.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:29, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The plethora of unreliable (read=blog, tabloid) sources outnumber the reliable sources; the latter is represented only by Times of India, but that is a one line synopsis. The topic unfortunately lacks the depth and persistence of coverage required to demonstrate sufficient notability for inclusion. ——SerialNumber54129 16:24, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you can check the following reference for in-depth coverage [1]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.