Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwao Lezzes-Tyt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kwao Lezzes-Tyt[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual who fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:ENT, and WP:CREATIVE. The article as it is does not provide sources that indicate the encyclopedia value of the subject, as they either written by the article subject or mention him in passing. The two sources that could be seen as passing WP:VER [1][2] are not enough to prove the subject Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment as is required by WP:ENT, which covers bloggers. SamHolt6 (talk) 22:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- non notable as either "social media marketer, public relations and celebrity brand expert, blogger, freelance journalist" or "reporter". Promo 'cruft & spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no where near enough reliable sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG, sources are not in depth enough, RS issues. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 03:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.